UTILITY AND CAPITAL

Reading through the May 6th issue of The New Republic I focused upon the article Nudge-ocracy: Barack Obama’s new theory of the state, as their seemed to be some causal reference to utilitarianism. What became more important than hunting the ambiguous minutiae, was resolving the tone and intent of the references. This recognition has made me aware of one detail crucial to the multiplication of some brief understanding of the fundamental relationship between utilitarianism and capitalism. That is, the merits of resolving a vast worth gap between commoditized capitalism and derivative capitalism must remand not only legislative decree but also a unanimously brief legal tender. And there is no exception but to compare the two for infinite deviations. As such, I wondered what method would be best suited for evaluating the two references versus the minutiae. Should I read every word of the bland article, pretending to have heard or read every one of its ambiguous citations, should I force my intellect to become extremely interested and look up even the mundane reference, should I count the number of indentations and calculate mathematically the relationship of the reference to the whole. No.

Rather immediately, I decided to simply highlight the references to utility, skim the remaining references, calculate mathematically how many of those were specifically relevant versus mundane, and then come back to it later because I’d nearly fallen asleep on the first page. After several days of referring to the articles generalis – the method by which our American media perpetrates bland intellect via gross commercialism – I came to the conclusion that, save two covert references to utilitarianism, there were no actual valuable details regarding socioeconomics. It was a wanton echo of 27 months of brand-making; save the utilitarianism. The two references are as follows:

“Instead (of liberal market regulation), Obama has set out to synthesize the New Democratic faith in the utility of markets with the Old Democratic emphasis on reducing inequality. “ (p. 22)

“Perhaps the easiest place to see it (Obama’s ideology) is in the administration’s fondness for behavioral economics, the branch of the dismal science that recognizes that humans aren’t utility-maximizing automatons, but flawed creatures who often screw up simple calculations and struggle with self-control.” (p. 24)

The summary statement is simple, utility and workforce should be the tool of corporations and government but not of the individual. This is a direct and vicious assault upon Independence and its byproduct is a sadistically addictive type of codependence that ignores mutuality[commodity] and reciprocity[exchange], which are the undeniable coefficients of market[commerce]; these in trade for hunger, in-obstinate greed and compliments.

Utilitarianism is now more than ever the term definitive of what is right and what is wrong with socioeconomics, of what (or who) is working and what (and whom) needs fixing – and by what means. But utilitarianism is also dependent upon the will of the people, in majority. Utilitarianism is not a type of government but is a principle of economics; and American Capitalism, now in its third to fifth generational derivative, could always benefit in equity from its inclusion.

Economics is the administrative hinge of War and Peace, and so economics must be the president’s function of resolving American state governance amidst the most spastic transition in the history of the presidency. Behavioral Economics, I must assume, is vastly non-uniform as want is common and ability is not. But necessity is also uniform and utility is its common suit.

THE AMERICAN UTILITARIAN CONSCRIPTION IS NOW CALLING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE AMERICAN STANDARD OF INCOME!
SUPPORT THE AMERICAN UTILITARIAN CONSCRIPTION!!!

Visit the U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor member webpage(s):
http://edlabor.house.gov/about/members/ and write or post a letter about the AUC.

Visit the U.S. House Committee for Oversight and Government Reform:
http://oversight.house.gov/about/members.asp

Visit comments@whitehouse.gov and write or post a letter about the AUC.