Apologia

As I sit at my small breakfast counter contemplating the effect of sending a “Writ of Expiration” to the debt creditors of Liechtenstein asking for their derivative(s) and interest timetable of the U.S. debts that were purchased from China several years ago now (though I am assured that my own name couldn’t possibly be on the list of debts); picking through a jar of rice that has, perhaps due to suffocating humidity, become mercurized with worms, staring at what should be my last bottle of “good wine” while pouring clean water into my teacup. I struggle by early candlelight to glean whether my ‘closing’ topic of choice (Onomatopoeia: An Indictment against the Rationale of Illegal Discrimination) can possibly be wrapped up in a year’s time. To start with, the preexisting condition (of onomatopoeia) has like many other polemical engines been thoroughly swallowed up in the verbosity and bureaucracy of The Age of Reason, which almost always seems to signify (to the modern mind) the need of an academic/historical excavation and a modern makeover. Secondly, to make as strong a statement as my treatise intends is also always the sort of exercise that will preclude the general and individual warnings of caution that are familiar to “limited free speech,” though there is no single charge against our current government outside the capitulating stagnation brokered by a history of political neglect and social appeasement that defines the drastic disparity between 1st & 2nd Amendment. And beyond the obvious perception of the history of the American Presidency is its most current theatre which is sure to be memorialized as America’s most vulnerable Presidency, regardless of any lasting successes. Set aside the past weeks allusions to a national memory loss crisis as the most chemical warfare the non-military U.S. has ever experienced, or the seemingly revolutionary but definitively tactical influx of Woman’s movements and President Barak Obama may return from vacation as President Michelle Obama.
And so while I had originally intended to write an apology for any disparaging remarks I nay have made towards President Obama – as is the custom for a declaration of candidacy; the overwhelming precedent of the emotions of campaign theatre make this impossible. And given the circumstances, even Obama himself would have to admit to a little name calling, “silly season” or not. And so, Apologia is instead more relevant a reference to the opening prologue of my first book as I do intend to assail the gross misappropriations of faith that have been the American Political Standard. Considering that the method is to detonate the contradiction of the hierarchy of American Discrimination beginning with the Separation of Church and State hocus-pocus, a reference to the essential ties to Republic that supersede mandamus, as in the manner of disputes that exist between Plato and Socrates (and summarily with Aristotle).
After all, isn’t it just a little too ironic that African-Americans initiated and fought a Civil Rights campaign over a decade and a half period with all but marginal changes in the “color” of political representation and their certainly were no recalls of political officials democratic or otherwise. And might I add that the nature of casualties (both to leaders and to followers) during this time was certainly enough cause for many citizens to withdraw support from a typically racist American International Policy. As I fish through the May 20th issue of Time magazine, I can’t help but assume that some similar sort of death-cast could have been clandestinely issued at the murders of Medgar Evers and Malcolm X and the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and the Rev. Dr. Martin L. King Jr., no progressive ever becoming the wiser. But all should agree that such a statement at the murder of “Four Little Girls in a Birmingham Church” is certainly the motive of Insanity! And now we may never know…that is unless or until the real version of 1st amendment exercise (latent dissemination) decides it’s time to thumb its nose at the rest of us on some televised version of American pickers.
And here, some forty years later, we elect our first “Black” President – immediately following the dual-term masquerade of 9/11’s chief purveyor – and we’re meant to ignore the obvious cause and effect!? Clearly whoever was responsible for 9/11 is more responsible for President Barack Hussein Obama than a kiplingesque literary premonition or any fool standing in line for covenant. And as painful or hurtful as it may be, even that deal was brokered with the same racist neglect that America’s “proper” political character has come to represent – all over the world. So it’s a real shame that anyone should think to associate America’s gas woes with this president as if separate from the bipartisan routine. And just what are the details of that deal?! Well the first and most damaging detail is marked by President Obama’s inability to represent “the greater sense of humanity” that is mandate upon The First African-American President of a nation rife with Abuses to the principle of Race and Discrimination; and the AUC initiative has shown how substantially just this one act would change our sophi-schistic socio-economic inequity. Second is the gross misrepresentation that Congress has forced upon Obama’s promise of transparency…but when all is said and done and the smoke has cleared, the view of Wall Street that is currently developing (with respect to worldview) may be more turnabout than anyone had hoped for. Clearly the truth of how WS and the Fed Res handle financial negotiations is far too disparate to represent justified regulation.
However, should the President decide to employ 10,000 (100,000) or so new campaigners to truly do the work of outreach and progressive political modeling – to truly take on the ideology of change beyond the façade of statistical analysis, then I could truly see myself owing up to his tenure. So why doesn’t this sort of strategy take form somewhere between the campaign office and the newsroom. And why do I get that same racist suspicion (intuition) that it never will. Well for starters, the gents who designed the payroll (yes, the top-end of campaign work is certainly paid for) for the 2008 election are likely to keep their jobs and may even, despite the economy, be up for a raise. Because what is the present day Campaign Director besides an old school hedge-fund manager. And ‘business as usual’ for David’s Plouffe and Axelrod is a predestined assurance for another version of “the greatest spin doctrine(s) in recent democratic history,” and not an exodus from racist and grossly underrepresented unemployment statistics. Secondly, the “First Black President of America” would have to be more than the name ‘out the side of the mouth’ of the newest hotshot “derivatives svengali.” He would have to be more the man with a plan rather than the man with a chance – but all’s well that ends well!
I guess if I had to choose just one thing in which the American Presidency truly does deserve my genuine and heartfelt apology it is for the bill of the cost of defending the country…against champion booboo’s. But because the Oklahoma City bombing still ranks among the top-three of our national terrorism catastrophes, pardon me my emotions if I feel that happiness around the breaking of a longstanding racism barrier – excepting no affective public plan for racial equality – might be a symptom of sabotage as opposed to a culmination of progress. But then again…I am currently more employed by my own struggle to believe in my America than by actual manifestations of the much needed changes in labor discrimination.