PRIDE AND PREJUDICE AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

Wondering whether the majority of Americans are glad that the political tumult in Pakistan is not a matter of US military support is a tough gesture given the milieu following a questionable election. It is tough to satisfy a majority contingent, and as those of us watching the past weeks news coverage clearly see, it was within the manner of one speech that the spin was totally reversed – irrespective of American media spin. What specifically is the context of the sociopolitical/socio-religious turmoil within Pakistan and where exactly does President Ahmedenijad’s failure to deliver on political promises lie with respect to a religious chaos? What is the historical play between he and Musavi and will it materialize further in the near future? These are questions that are immediate to military presence. Surely a people capable of such immediate and staunch political action must surely be capable of deliberately formal amnesty plans. The problem seems to be that differences are most celebrated during the time of election, but what of exacting formality throughout the political term. As similar as the current Iranian debacle is to our election of 2004(tractably so), quite ironically, the American election of 2008 may likely go down in history as the most orthodox, or conventional, contradiction of political personalities. Why?
Although Obama – who is much younger(than McCain who served in the Vietnam War), more progressive(than McCain whose most conservative attribute is that he is duty-bound to supporting the American military concept), and is totally destined to become an American historical icon(compared to McCain whose current image is all but invisible thanks to a covertly ranting Dick Cheney and the American Gung-Ho-ism that was the true sickness of pro-Vietnam War politics) – does represent the indomitable spirit of a soothing revolution and is likely the political checkmate to Violent Imperialism, he and McCain did seem(if not for one day) to share…a similar temperament .
And so what does it mean to Musavi supporters to have a head of state whose core political ethic(religious freedom aside) is exactly the opposite of their own principal? Well that is quite apparent, but what has not been said is that there are likely far less superfluous methods of dealing Ahmadinijad a bogus rap. For instance, what if an unconfirmed story was picked up describing he and Musavi as rivals from way back in their elementary school days(as there is no contemporaneous gap)? Then the case could be made that Ahmadinijad has always beaten Musavi…at everything(soccer and video games included). Or that Musavi’s candidacy was the result of an historic write-in coincidence deserving of world recognition. Because I have not heard the case made that Musavi represents an underrepresented socio-politic – only that he has somewhere near 50% support; which is no longer an oddity by media standards. What about Iran’s poor people? And what about the formal protest beyond the election – what will that entail? Ultimately, a current democracy with a religious superior must be portrayed with more historical details with respect to politics and more intimacies with respect to social class in order to avoid being an ostensibly unwarranted or ostentatiously transient instigation. http://current.com/items/89438469_americas-secret-war.htm
I could never dream of suggesting that the American Army be withdrawn from expressing U.S. and U.N International sanction(s). But I could suggest that American soldiers would make great teachers, in part, in the U.S., in a program designed to reconstruct the American economic makeup beginning with high school non-graduates. Perhaps even better than they can stop(or prevent) the bullets of revolution!


SUPPORT THE AMERICAN UTILITARIAN CONSCRIPTION!!!
http://AmericanUtilitarianConscription.blogspot.com
THE AMERICAN UTILITARIAN CONSCRIPTION IS NOW CALLING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE AMERICAN STANDARD OF INCOME!

Visit the U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor member webpage(s):
http://edlabor.house.gov/about/members/ and write or post a letter about the AUC.

Visit the U.S. House Committee for Oversight and Government Reform:
http://oversight.house.gov/about/members.asp and write or post a letter about the AUC.